Welcome to Open Carnage

A resource for gamers and technology enthusiasts, with unique means of rewarding individual content creation and support. Have a wander to see why we're worth the time!

Tucker933

Suggest an Article (one per post)

968 posts in this topic

Dislike the ads? Log in or register to never see them again!

3 hours ago, Wojtek said:

 

I originally posted this article with reserves on credibility of source, source has been confirmed not highly recommended for OC use so thread had been deleted.  Sorry for the confusion.

 


Rumors are carried by haters
Spread by fools
and
Accepted by idiots

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Krazychic said:

 

I originally posted this article with reserves on credibility of source, source has been confirmed not highly recommended for OC use so thread had been deleted.  Sorry for the confusion.

 

 

I'm bit confused here. The source was confirmed, but not recommend for OC use? 


"THE CIA IS MADE UP OF BOYS WHOSE FAMILIES SENT THEM TO PRINCETON, BUT WOULDN'T LET THEM INTO THE FAMILY BROKERAGE BUSINESS" - LBJ

 

Weps.gif

 

|DesertRockXI|Quartermasters Chest|Twitter|SoundCloud|

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Wojtek said:

I'm bit confused here. The source was confirmed, but not recommend for OC use? 

Fox in blacklisted here altogether, sorry.


2nd-landin.png

There's a tremendous bias against taking risks. Everyone is trying to optimize their ass-covering.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Tucker933 said:

Fox in blacklisted here altogether, sorry.

 

I wasn't aware of that. If I may ask, why is that?

Edited by Wojtek

"THE CIA IS MADE UP OF BOYS WHOSE FAMILIES SENT THEM TO PRINCETON, BUT WOULDN'T LET THEM INTO THE FAMILY BROKERAGE BUSINESS" - LBJ

 

Weps.gif

 

|DesertRockXI|Quartermasters Chest|Twitter|SoundCloud|

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Wojtek said:

I wasn't aware of that. If I may as, why is that?

Their embellishment and bias that cheery-picks the facts they cover. They have the worst reputation on that front compared to any of the other major news sources.

 

Generally you don't need to know, as the Editor will try to pick an alternative source if a poor one is recommended, but none were found on this topic.


2nd-landin.png

There's a tremendous bias against taking risks. Everyone is trying to optimize their ass-covering.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.